U.S. Supreme Court Interpretation Permits Thousands of “Church Plans” – Including Many for Hospitals and Health Systems – to Remain Exempt from ERISA

On June 5, 2017, the United States Supreme Court unanimously adopted a “broad” interpretation of the exemption allowed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) for “church plans.”   The decision effectively permits thousands of retirement plans adopted by church-affiliated organizations – including numerous hospitals, schools and social-service organizations – to remain exempt from most ERISA requirements.

Plaintiffs in the case of Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton argued that a “narrow” interpretation of the “church plan” exemption was appropriate, and that they were damaged by their employers failing to comply with ERISA’s various requirements designed to protect employee retirement savings.  Advocates of the “narrow” interpretation argued that only plans actually established by a church should be eligible for the exemption.

A split among the United States Courts of Appeal between the “broad” and “narrow” interpretations of the exemption had left plan sponsors and participants in an uncertain state where the applicable plan was maintained by a church-affiliated group and not established by the church itself.

A considerable number of plans in question related to church-affiliated hospitals and health systems.  A “narrow” interpretation would render such plans subject to ERISA.

In an 8-0 decision authored by Justice Elena Kagan, the Supreme Court concluded that principles of statutory interpretation favored the conclusion that Congress chose language indicating a “broad” exemption.  The “broad” exemption had been employed in interpretive materials, advisory opinions and private letter rulings of the Internal Revenue Service and Department of Labor, so the decision eliminates, for now, the uncertainty that had arisen with respect to plans that had relied on said interpretation.

© 2017 Vandenack Weaver LLC
For more information, Contact Us

Advertisements

RETIREMENT PLAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS IN LIGHT OF THE INCREASING PERMITTED ELECTIVE DEFERRAL

 

PLAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS IN LIGHT OF THE INCREASING PERMITTED ELECTIVE DEFERRAL

 

1.                  PLAN DESIGN GENERALLY

a.                  The purpose of the employer in sponsoring a plan drives the particular plan design.

         Is the employer sponsoring a plan for the purpose of attracting and/or retaining a certain type of employee? (e.g. high tech).

         Is the employer sponsoring a plan for the purpose of maximizing retirement plan benefits to the owner of the company?

b.                  Plan design should consider the business structure of the employer and the demographics of the employees of the business.

c.                  Plan design should consider the desirability of staying on a prototype as opposed to becoming individually designed.

d.                  This outline assumes that the employer has analyzed plan design generally and adopted a plan with a 401(k) feature subject to ADP testing.

e.                  This outline focuses on ADP.  Coverage and ACP should be considered in conjunction with any of the approaches in this outline. 

f.                   Prototype vs. Individually Designed Plan.

 

 

2.         THE INCREASING ELECTIVE DEFERRAL LIMIT

        Plans with a 401(k) feature permit participants to defer a portion of salary up to an annual limit.

        Amount that employees can defer is increasing:

 

Year    Maximum Elective Deferral Limit    Catch Up Contributions

2002               $11,000                                              $1,000

2003               $12,000                                              $2,000

2004               $13,000                                              $3,000

2005               $14,000                                              $4,000

2006               $15,000                                              $5,000

     2007               $15,500                                              $5,000

     2008               $15,500*                                            $5,000*

 

     *Beginning in 2009, both limits will be subject to cost of living increases.

 

3.         IMPACT OF INCREASING DEFERRAL LIMIT ON THE ADP TEST    

      HCEs often defer the maximum permissible.  As the deferral limit increases, HCEs increase contributions to the maximum.

      NHCEs often do not increase their contributions, or increase contributions by a lesser amount.

 

Result:

       More plans are struggling to pass the ADP test.

 

 

4.         WHAT IS THE ADP TEST?

      Plans with a 401(k) feature must meet one of two actual deferral percentage tests for the plan year:

      Test 1.  ADP for eligible highly compensated employees (HCEs) is not more than the ADP of all other eligible employees (non highly compensated employees, or NHCEs) multiplied by 1.25; or

      Test 2.  The ADP for eligible HCEs is not more than 2 percentage points over the ADP for eligible NHCEs, and the ADP for the HCEs is not more than 2 times the ADP of eligible NCHEs.

 

b          Definitions

     Compensation for the ADP test is Code Section 414(s) compensation.

     HCE

   5% owner (or spouse)

      $100,000 compensation for FY 2007, increased to $105,000 in 2008.   This figure includes elective deferrals and elective contributions to cafeteria plans and certain other plans

   top-paid group – earns more than $105,000 (2008) and is in top 20%, ranked by compensation 

NHCE is everyone else

 

 

Example 1:

                             Comp.                        2004               ADP               

     HCE1             $205,000         $13,000          6.34%                        HCE2             $180,000       $12,000     6.67%           

     NHCE1           $  60,000         $  6,000        10.00%           

     NHCE2           $  40,000        $   3,200          8.00%

     NCHE3           $  40,000         $  2,000          5.00%           

     NHCE4           $  40,000        $         0          0.00%            

     NHCE5           $  20,000        $     600          3.00%

     NHCE6           $  20,000        $     300          1.50%

    

                               2004 HCE ADP% =  6.51%

                                      NHCE ADP% = 4.58%

 

                                    ADP Test 1 Failed

6.51%/4.58% = 1.42

1.42 > 1.25,

ADP Test 1 Failed

 

                             ADP Test 2 Passed

                                                6.51% – 4.58% = 1.93%

                                                1.93% < 2 % and

                                                1.93% < 9.15 (2 times the NHCE ADP%)

                                                ADP Test 2 Passed

 

                             Therefore, PLAN PASSES ADP TEST IN 2004

 

                             Comp.                        2005               ADP               

     HCE1             $210,000       $14,000            6.67%                       

     HCE2             $190,000       $14,000            7.37%           

     NHCE1           $  61,800        $ 6,180         10.00%           

     NHCE2           $  41,200        $ 3,296           8.00% 

     NHCE3           $  41,20          $ 2,060           5.00%          

     NHCE4           $  41,200        $        0           0.00%           

     NHCE5           $  20,600        $    600           2.91% 

     NHCE6           $  20,600        $    309           1.50%          

 

                             2005 HCE ADP% =    7.02%

                                      NHCE ADP% = 4.57%

    

                             ADP Test 1 Failed

                             ADP Test 2 Failed

                             Therefore, PLAN FAILS ADP TEST IN 2005

 

 

 

What is the greatest ADP available to HCE group based on NHCE ADP:

 

                        NHCE ADP                            MaximumHCE ADP

                        Less than 2%                               2 x NHCE ADP

                        2% – 8%                                    2% + NHCE ADP

                        More than 8%                         1.25 NHCE x ADP

 

 

5.         PLAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

1.      Safe Harbor Plan

2.      Definition of Compensation

3.      Component Plans

4.      Change Eligibility Requirements

5.      Other Options are available.  Outline is limited to the above four options.

 

Design Consideration 1 – The Safe Harbor Plan

 

       3% nonelective to all eligible employees regardless of deferral levels

      The 3% safe harbor plan can also be designed to resolve top heavy issues and ACP concerns.

      Employer match 100% to 3% and 50 % for amounts over 3% up to 5%.

      Enhanced Matching Contribution

      Safe Harbor Plan Factors

      Match or nonelective is always 100% vested

      Safe Harbor can be designed to satisfy top heavy contribution requirement, if applicable.

      Safe Harbor contributions can be contributed to a plan other than the 401(k) plan.

      Notice Requirement.

      The MAYBE non-elective safe harbor plan.

      The employer has the flexibility to decide, late in the plan year, to provide the safe harbor nonelective contribution, if the employer gives a “maybe” notice on a timely basis and satisfies the regulatory requirements.  Only applies to safe harbor nonelective and not safe harbor match.

      Plan may be amended during plan year to provide that employer will make the safe harbor nonelective contribution for the entire plan year. 

      Notice

      Safe harbor “maybe” notice must be provided to participants at least 30 days and not more than 90 days prior to the beginning of the plan year.

      Supplemental safe harbor notice to plan participants at least 30 days before the last day of the plan year informing them of the amendment.

 

 

 

Design Consideration 2 – Compensation Definitions

       Deduction Compensation, Contribution Compensation and Testing Compensation.

       Employer bases its deduction for plan contributions on gross compensation.

       A plan may provide for allocating contributions on gross or net compensation.  The Employer must specify in its Plan document the definition of “compensation” for purposes of contribution allocations.

       The plan administrator may test plan allocations for non-discrimination using gross or net compensation.  A plan is not required to specify a compensation definition for testing purposes.  Avoid limiting your flexibility in this manner unless there is good reason to.

       Gross Compensation is total non-deferred compensation includible in gross income plus elective contributions under the 401(k) plan and under a plan described in Section 125.

       Net Compensation is:

a.      W-2 Compensation – total nondeferred compensation includable in gross income.

b.      Compensation for purposes of federal income tax withholding – determined without regard to remuneration included base on the nature or location of the work (i.e. agricultural labor described in Code § 3401(a)(2)).

 

Contribution Allocation Compensation

       In plan design, consider carefully the demographics of your company to determine the compensation definition that should be used for your plan.  RUN THE NUMBERS and monitor them from year to year.

 

       Should bonuses be included?

      If all HCEs with income of $150,000 have deferred the max, then including bonuses may reduce the ADP of the HCEs.

 

Example 2:

 

                 Comp   Deferral     ADP           Comp w/bonus   Deferral       ADP

HCE    $100,000   $14,000     14.00%         $150,000     $14,000      9.33%

NHCE  $ 50,000    $ 4,000       8.00%           $ 55,000     $  4,400      8.00%

 

 

       If HCEs generally have compensation in excess of $210,000 and generally defer to the maximum, consider providing for the opportunity to defer additional amounts on bonuses.

 

Example 3:

           

                  Comp  Deferral      ADP         Comp w/bonus   Deferral       ADP

HCE    $210,000   $14,000      6.67%       $210,000       $14,000     6.67%

NHC   $  50,000   $  3,000      6.00%        $ 55,000        $  8,000   14.55%

                                                      (assumes deferral of entire NHCE bonus)

 

       If HCEs generally have compensation less than $210,000 and are likely to receive a bonus and defer the entirety and NHCEs are likely to use the bonuses as Christmas cash, then inclusion of bonuses will increase the difference between HCE deferral percentage and non-HCE deferral percentage.

 

Example 4:

           

                  Comp    Deferral    ADP          Comp w/bonus   Deferral       ADP

HCE     $150,000   $10,000   6.67%       $180,000      $14,000     7.77%

NHCE  $  50,000   $  3,000    6.00%       $  55,000      $ 3,000     5.45%

 

 

      Should fringe benefits be included?

      Same issues generally as bonuses.

      If HCEs are primary recipients of fringes and HCEs are under Covered Compensation maximum, then consider including as the inclusion will reduce the deferral percentage of HCEs.

 

ADP COMPENSATION

       Administrator can make operational elections annually.

       Run a pre-test and determine how various possible definitions impact test results (consider expense).

       Results will change from year to year.

 

Design Consideration 3 – Component Plans

       Consider component plans that will enhance employee deferrals.

       Employer may restructure a plan into selected groups of employees using any criteria.  Each component consists of all of the allocations, accruals, and other benefits, rights and

       features provided to a particular group of employees under the plan.

       Consider the employer’s work force

       Is there a group of high-tech employees who are likely to contribute more if there is a quicker vest in conjunction with a traditional work group that is likely to prefer a greater       match with a vesting schedule?

       Is there a group of long-term employees with respect to whom the employer is willing to offer a higher rate of match with a vesting schedule?

       Each component group must include a nondiscriminatory group of employees.  If a component group satisfies coverage, then it is appropriate for the plan to apply the nondiscrimination test without regard to the contributions or benefits provided to employees outside of that group. 

 

Design Consideration 4 – Eligibility Requirements

       Consider eligibility requirements that will exclude certain classifications of employees from ADP testing.

       An employee who irrevocably elects not to participate in the plan is not included in ADP testing.  Consider such an election for employees with long-term reasons for opting out.

       Part-time employees

       Union employees

       Minimum Age – use 21.

 

 

6.         Other Considerations

       Catch-up Contributions – Ask older HCEs to classify contributions as catch-up contributions first.

       Limit elective deferral contributions of HCEs.

       QNECs and QMACs – employer contributions which satisfy certain nonforfeitability requirements and distribution requirements

       QMACs – employer matching contributions that are 100 percent vested at all times and that are subject to the same restrictions on distributability as are elective contributions

       QNECs – employer nonelective contributions, other than matching contributions, that satisfy the same requirements.

 For ADP purposes, may be treated as elective contributions if the allocation of nonelective contributions is nondiscriminatory.

       QMACs instead of bonuses

       If an employer 401(k) plan does not provide for matching contributions other than QMACs and if the plan does not permit employee after tax contributions, the employer may shift 

      QMACs to the ADP test. Caution: Shifting QMACs could make things worse.

            Do monitor the testing inclusions.  The employer is responsible for getting the right data to the third party administrator. Even the best third party administrator does not know your     employees.  The vigilant eye of the employer HR department will save a lot of ADP inaccuracies.  Little inaccuracies have a big swing.

 

 

7.         What To Do When You Fail the ADP Test?

 

A plan that fails the ADP test has “excess contributions.”  To correct excess contributions, the employer may:

 

       Make corrective QNECs or QMACs.

       Additional contributions are made to one or more of the NHCEs with the lowest compensation.

       Reduces the cost of nondiscrimination compliance.

       Regulations limit the use of these methods of compliance. 

 

Example 5: Using QNECs to correct failed ADP Test

           

                   Comp       Deferral   ADP         QNEC    Corrected ADP

HCE       $210,000   $14,000     6.67%       $      0          6.67%

            NHCE     $  70,000   $10,000  10.00%      $        0        10.00%   

            NHCE     $  25,000   $  1,000    4.00%       $   920         7.68%

            NHCE3   $  20,000   $         0    0.00%      $ 1,000         5.00%

 

                        Pre Correction:           HCE ADP = 8.34%

                                                            NHCE ADP = 2.00%

 

                        Post Correction         HCE ADP = 8.34%

                                                            NHCE ADP = 6.34%

     

       Rules for bottom-up QNECs

      The employer may not take a QNEC into account for an NHCE in the ADP test to the extent the QNEC for the NHCE exceeds the greater of 5% of compensation or two times the plan’s representative contribution rate times the NHCEs compensation.

      Employer may not count a QNEC in the ADP test if less than half of all NHCEs receive QNECs or if the QNEC is more than double the QNECs most other NHCEs are receiving, except that a QNEC not in excess of 5% of compensation is always permissible.

      Make corrective distributions to HCEs.  Distribute timely the excess contribution (plus allocable income).   IRC provides rules to calculate the amount that must be returned.

        IRS Advance Notice 97-2.

        Distributions must include allocable income.

        Timely distribution is generally 2 ½ months after the end of the plan year.

      Recharacterize the excess contributions as after-tax employee contributions.

        May cause other problems.

 

The plan may provide for more than one correction method or may provide for a combination of methods as to any or all affected HCEs.

 

AVOID FAILING THE ADP TEST

      Review ADP status in the month prior to plan year-end.

      IRS correction procedures. 

 

  

                                                                           

© 2008 Parsonage Vandenack Williams LLC

 

For more information, contact info@pvwlaw.com